RETIRED VET: [on not taking the vaxx] I was told I was selfish, and a threat to humanity.
MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: What's your reply to the selfishness?
RETIRED VET: [sighs] It was really difficult because these are my friends on FaceBook, and I didn't want to be mean to them, but they were being really mean to me. But also I understand that they're being responsible members of the community, it's just that they're not being told the whole story, and there's a lot more to the story. And whilst they're being responsible members of the community, they're also missing out on the rest of the story, and the rest of the story is that everyone else is actually being shut out of the community, and treated really unfairly when we're the ones who actually should be listened to because we're the ones who are sharing the whole story and they're only getting part of it. So it was really sad because, anyway—
MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Further to that, there's, as we've been talking to more and more people, there seems to be an accepted belief amongst psychologists that in certain times people prefer a lie to the truth. And we're sort of seeing that here, that they don't seem to care they've only got a partial story, as long as they believe their masters, and then if you come out with the truth, they actually attack you. And this is actually throughout history, it's been documented. It's really peculiar.
RETIRED VET: Well yes, there's, I know all about this because while I've been out of work, so, I'll just— That's exactly right, though. It is a form of groupthink. And it is herding mentality. And it's like, a lot of people did get a nice sense of belonging when they were part of a community that is doing the right thing for everyone else. But at the same time people who seek the truth also could be part of this community too, and we could all be seeking the truth instead and also still getting that wonderful warm and fuzzy feel-good feeling that we're doing something right that's for the best, betterment of everybody, not just the people who want us to get vaccinated.
So yeah, it was a really confusing time. I had to look up a lot to find the actual reason was, and it comes down to naive thinking basically. It's fast thinking, it's shallow, superficial thinking where people have to make a decision on the spot. And it's like, the general consensus is this, I don't have time to go into these conspiracies, which is what they're called. Well they are! But they're facts not theories. And yeah, of course I understand that people have a job, they have a family,
and they just want to do the right thing. However, it got really scary.
Even a layman can understand this with a little study.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
As described in this article by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., fraud is also taking place.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1000. This means that 993 people out of 1000 will not be infected whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR, and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. For the safety of ourselves and our families, we should at least take a little time to look at the clinical trial reports. Below are the results of my numerical calculations from several clinical trial reports. Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
Thank you for this terrific interview. Am sharing widely.
I Was Taught That You Don't Vaccinate the Sick
The Last Freedom Truck, Cafe Locked Out
Nov 22, 2022
https://cafelockeddown.substack.com/p/i-was-taught-that-you-dont-vaccinate#details
TRANSCRIPT - BRIEF EXCERPT [on groupthink]
6:45
RETIRED VET: [on not taking the vaxx] I was told I was selfish, and a threat to humanity.
MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: What's your reply to the selfishness?
RETIRED VET: [sighs] It was really difficult because these are my friends on FaceBook, and I didn't want to be mean to them, but they were being really mean to me. But also I understand that they're being responsible members of the community, it's just that they're not being told the whole story, and there's a lot more to the story. And whilst they're being responsible members of the community, they're also missing out on the rest of the story, and the rest of the story is that everyone else is actually being shut out of the community, and treated really unfairly when we're the ones who actually should be listened to because we're the ones who are sharing the whole story and they're only getting part of it. So it was really sad because, anyway—
MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Further to that, there's, as we've been talking to more and more people, there seems to be an accepted belief amongst psychologists that in certain times people prefer a lie to the truth. And we're sort of seeing that here, that they don't seem to care they've only got a partial story, as long as they believe their masters, and then if you come out with the truth, they actually attack you. And this is actually throughout history, it's been documented. It's really peculiar.
RETIRED VET: Well yes, there's, I know all about this because while I've been out of work, so, I'll just— That's exactly right, though. It is a form of groupthink. And it is herding mentality. And it's like, a lot of people did get a nice sense of belonging when they were part of a community that is doing the right thing for everyone else. But at the same time people who seek the truth also could be part of this community too, and we could all be seeking the truth instead and also still getting that wonderful warm and fuzzy feel-good feeling that we're doing something right that's for the best, betterment of everybody, not just the people who want us to get vaccinated.
So yeah, it was a really confusing time. I had to look up a lot to find the actual reason was, and it comes down to naive thinking basically. It's fast thinking, it's shallow, superficial thinking where people have to make a decision on the spot. And it's like, the general consensus is this, I don't have time to go into these conspiracies, which is what they're called. Well they are! But they're facts not theories. And yeah, of course I understand that people have a job, they have a family,
and they just want to do the right thing. However, it got really scary.
9:22
[END OF EXCERPT]
Brilliant Interview.
What an Amazing Woman.
Thank you Guys for you're dedication to this strange 'Happening' 🙏
Excellent interview
Ivermectin was .made by Merck.
Always there can be danger in it's acute use dosage
Even a layman can understand this with a little study.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
As described in this article by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., fraud is also taking place.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1000. This means that 993 people out of 1000 will not be infected whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR, and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. For the safety of ourselves and our families, we should at least take a little time to look at the clinical trial reports. Below are the results of my numerical calculations from several clinical trial reports. Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenza A, B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered meningococcal ACWY-vax instead of saline
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all it says is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY-vax.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Gardasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected can actually be harmful.
In the case of Gardasil, you should be tested to see if you are already infected or not before administering it.
Vaccination Girdasil while infected is highly carcinogenic, so regular testing and early surgery are best.
However, the authorities have not made this mandatory, and I feel that they are being malicious.
Recently, vaccines have been approved without actual clinical trials (RCTs) and based solely on increased antibody titers,
but as you all know, RNA viruses mutate one after another, so antibodies are not very effective against the actual mutated RNA viruses.
A midwestern doctor (who remains anonymous for his safety) says that in his experience, the only effective vaccines are BCG and, in underdeveloped countries with poor sanitation, MMR. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-each?publication_id=748806&post_id=146563874&isFreemail=true&r=1820ci&triedRedirect=true